CHAPTER
92
DIVINE
CHASTISEMENT
For the
moment all discipline seems painful rather that pleasant, but later it yields
the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it (HEBREWS
12:11 ESV).
One reason, perhaps, why so little
is written today upon Divine chastisement, and why it so rarely forms the
theme of the pulpit, is because it doesn’t suit the false temper and sentiments
of this superficial age. The great majority of the preachers are men-pleasers,
who carefully trim their sails to the breezes of popular opinion. They are
paid to speak “smooth things” and not those which will disturb, to soothe
consciences rather than search them. That which is unpalatable, mournful,
solemn, dread-inspiring, is sedulously avoided, and attractive, cheerful,
and comforting subjects are substituted in their stead. Hence, not only is
it now rare for the preacher to dwell upon the eternal punishment of the wicked
and bid the unsaved flee from the wrath to come, but Christians hear very
little about the Father’s rod, and the groans it occasions, or the fruits
it afterwards produces. Fifty years ago a faithful servant of God wrote: “One
of the platitudes of the present day is that religion is not a gloomy, but
a cheerful thing. Although it is easy to see what was meant by him who first
opposed this assertion, either to morbid and self-assumed gloom, or to the
ignorant representation of the world; yet as it is generally understood, nothing
can be less true. Blessed are they that mourn. Woe unto you that laugh. Narrow
is the way.
Alas, that conditions have become so
much worse since then. The attractions of the world, and everything which is
pleasing to the flesh, have been brought into thousands of “churches” (?) under
the plea of being “necessary if the young people are to be held.” Even in those
places where the bars have not thus been let down, where the grosser forms of worldliness
are not yet tolerated, the preaching is generally of such a character that few
are likely to be made uneasy by it. He who dwells on the exceeding sinfulness
of sin, who insists that God will not tolerate unjudged sin even in His own
people, but will surely visit it with heavy stripes, is a “kill joy,” a
“troubler of Israel,” a “Job’s comforter”; and if he persists in enforcing the
precepts, admonitions, warnings, and judgments of Holy Scripture, is likely to
soon find all doors dosed against him. But better this, than be a compromiser;
better be deprived of all preaching engagements, than miss the Master’s “Well
done” in the Day to come. “Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be
joyous, but grievous: nevertheless, afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit
of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby” (verse 11). In this
verse the apostle concludes his discussion of that theme which is now so
unwelcome to the majority of professing Christians. Therein he brings to a
close all that he had said concerning those disciplinary afflictions which an
all-wise God brings upon His people in this life, His gracious design in the
same, and the duty incumbent upon them to receive these in a right spirit. He
sums up his argument by balancing the good over against the evil, the future
over against the present, the judgment of faith over against the feelings of
the flesh.
Our present text is added to what has
been said in the previous verses for the purpose of anticipating and removing
an objection. After all the comforting and encouraging statements made, namely,
that chastisements proceed not from enemies but from our Father, that they
are sent not in anger but in love, that they are designed not to crush but
“for our profit”; carnal sense and natural reason interposes an objection:
“But we find no joy under our afflictions, instead much sorrow. We do not
feel that they are for our profit; we cannot see how they can
be so; therefore we are much inclined to doubt what you have said.” The apostle
grants the force of the objection: that for the present, chastening does
“seem to be grievous and not joyous.” But he brings in a double limitation
or qualification: in reference to outward sense, it only “seems” so; in reference
to time, this is only for “the present.” Having made this concession, the
apostle turns to the objector and says, “Nevertheless.’’ He reminds him that,
first, there is an “afterward” beyond the present moment, to be borne in mind;
second, he presses on him the need of being “exercised thereby”; third, he
assures him that if he is so exercised “peaceable fruit” will be the happy
issue.
1. All that carnal reason can perceive
in our chastenings is BUT SEEMING.
All that flesh and blood can
discover about the nature and quality of Divine afflictions is but their
outward and superficial appearance. The eye of reason is utterly incapable of
discovering the virtue and value of sanctified trials. How often we are
deceived by mere “seeming”! This is true in the natural sphere: appearances are
proverbially deceptive. There are many optical illusions. Have you not noticed
some nights when the sun is sinking in the west, that it is much bigger than at
its zenith? Yet it is not so in reality; it only “seems” to be so. Have you
stood on the deck of a ship in mid-ocean and, while gazing at the horizon,
suddenly been startled by the sight of land? — The outline of the coast, with
the rising hills in the background, there deafly defined? Yet after all, it was
but “seeming”; it was nothing but clouds. In like manner, you have read of a
mirage seen by travelers in the desert: away over the sands, they see in the
distance green trees and a shining pool of water; but this is only an optical
delusion, effected in some way by the atmosphere. Now if this be so in
connection with natural things, the “seeming” not being the actual, the
apparent not being the reality, how much more is it true in connection
with the things of God! Afflictions are not what they “seem” to be. They appear
to work for our ill, and not for our good; so that we are inclined to say, “An
enemy hath done this.” They seem to be for our injury, rather than our
“profit,” and we murmur and are cast down.
So often fear distorts our
vision; so often unbelief brings scales over our eyes, and we exaggerate
the dimensions of trials in the dark and dim light.
So often we are selfish, fond of our
fleshly ease; and therefore spiritual discernment falls to a low ebb. No,
chastenings for the present do not seem to be joyous, but “grievous”;
but that is because we view them through our natural senses and in the light of
carnal reason.
2. Carnal reason judges afflictions in
the light of the PRESENT. The tendency with all of us is to estimate things in the light of the now.
The ungodly are ever ready to sacrifice their future interests for present
gratification. One of their favorite mottos is, “A bird in the hand is worth
two in the bush:” it may be to the slothful, but the enterprising and diligent
would rather be put to a little trouble and secure the two. Man is a very
shortsighted creature, and even the Christian is often dominated by the same
sentiments that regulate the wicked. The light of the now is generally
the worst in which to form a true estimate of things. We are too close to
them to obtain a right perspective, and see things in their proper perspective.
To view an oil painting to the best advantage, we need to step back a few
feet from it. The same principle applies to our lives. Proof of this is found
as we now look back upon that which is past. Today the
The case of Jacob is much to the
point, and should guard us against following his foolish example. After Joseph
had been removed from his doting father, and when he thought he had lost Simeon
too, viewing things in the light of “the present,” he resentfully said, “All
these things are against me” (Genesis 42:36). Such is often the mournful
griping which comes from our short-sighted unbelief. But later, Jacob
discovered his mistake, and found that all those things had been working
together for good to himself and his loved ones. Alas, we are so impatient and
impetuous, so occupied with the present, that we fail to look forward and by
faith anticipate the happy sequel. Then, too, the effects which afflictions
have upon the old man disqualify us to evaluate them correctly. If my
heart is palpitating, if my mind is agitated, and my soul is cast down, then I
am in not fit state to judge the quality and blessedness of Divine afflictions.
No, chastenings for the present do not “seem to be joyous, but
grievous;” that is because we take such a shortsighted view of them and fail to
look to the future with the eyes of faith and hope.
3. To carnal reason afflictions never
seem “joyous.” This
logically follows from what has been before us under the first two points.
Because carnal reason sees only the “seeming” of things, and because
it estimates them only in the light of “the present,” afflictions are
not joyous. Nor does God intend that, in themselves, they should be. If afflictions
did “seem” to be joyous, would they be chastisements at all? It would
be of little use for an earthly parent to whip his child in such a way as
to produce only smiles.
4. To carnal reason afflictions ever
seem to be “grievous.” Probably the most grievous part to the Christian is that he cannot see
how much a loss or trial can possibly benefit him. If he could see, he would
rejoice. Even here we must walk by faith and not by sight. But this is
easier said than done; yea, it can only be done by God’s enabling. Usually, the
Christian completely fails to see why such a trouble is sent upon him; it
seems to work harm and not good. Why this financial loss, when he was giving
more to the Lord’s work? Why this breakdown in health, when he was being most
used in His service? Why this removal of a Sunday school teacher, just when he
was most needed? Why was my husband called away, when the children needed him
the most? Yes, such afflictions are indeed grievous to the flesh. But let it be
pointed out that these reasoning’s are only “seeming.” The Christian, by
grace, eventually triumphs. Faith looks up at the cloud (though it is often
very late in doing so) and says, the chastisement was not as severe as it might
have been, certainly it was not as severe as I deserved, and truly it was
nothing in comparison to what the Savior suffered for me. O let faith expel
carnal reason, and say, “For our light affliction, which is but for a moment,
works for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory.” But note
carefully that this is only while we look not at the things which are
seen, but at the things which are not seen” (2 Corinthians 4:17, 18). For much
in the above four points the writer acknowledges his indebtedness to a sermon
by C.H. Spurgeon on the same verse. “Nevertheless, afterward it yielded the
peaceable fruit of righteousness to them which are trained by it.” This is what
the apostle sets over against the conclusion of carnal reason and the feelings
of our natural senses. Medicine may not be a pleasant thing to take, but if it
is blessed by God, the renewed health it gives is good compensation. The pruned
vine at the end of the winter presents a sorry appearance to the eye, but its
heavily-laden branches in the autumn vindicate the gardener’s efforts. Did not
the “afterward” prove to Jacob that his doleful reasoning’s were quite unwarranted?
Job squirmed under the rod, as well he might, but was not his end more
prosperous than his beginning? Thank God for this “Nevertheless afterward.” Yet
this “afterward” is also a very searching word: it is one which should pierce
and test each of us. Have we not all passed through sorrow? Can any of us look
back on the past without recalling seasons of deep and heavy affliction? Has no
sword pierced our souls, no painful sacrifice been demanded of us? But, my
reader, do these experiences belong to the past in every sense? Have they gone,
disappeared, without leaving any effects behind them? No, that is
impossible: we are either the better or the worse because of them. Then ask
yourself, what fruits have they produced? Have your past experiences
hardened, soured, frozen you? Or have they softened, sweetened and mellowed
you? Has pride been subdued, self-pleasing been mortified, patience developed?
How have afflictions, chastisements, left us? What does the “afterward”
reveal?
All men are not the gainers by afflictions;
nor are Christians always so. Many seek to flee from trials and troubles,
instead of being “trained” by them. Others are callous and do not yield: as
(Hebrews 12:5) insinuates they “despised” the chastening of the Lord. There
are some who imagine that, when visited with affliction, it is a display of
courage if they refuse to be affected. They count it weakness to mourn over
losses and weep over sorrows. But such an attitude is altogether un-Christian.
Christ wept and again and again we are told that He “groaned.” Such an attitude
is also foolish to the last degree, for it is calculated to counteract the
very design of afflictions, and only calls for severer ones to break our proud
spirits. It is no mark of weakness to acknowledge that we feel the strokes
of an Almighty arm. It is the truest wisdom to humble ourselves beneath
“the mighty hand of God.” If we are among His people, He will mercifully
compel us to acknowledge that His chastenings aren’t to be despised and made
light of. He will — and O how easily He can do it — continue or increase
our afflictions until He tames our wild spirits, and brings us like
obedient children into subjection to Himself. What a warning is found in (Isaiah
1. The conscience needs to be
“trained.” There must be a turning to the Sender of our trials, and seeking
from Him of the meaning and message of them. “There was a famine in the days of
David for three years, year after year; and David inquired of the Lord”
(2 Samuel 21:1) So should we when the providences of God frown upon us. There
must be an honest self-examination, a diligent scrutiny of our ways, to
discover what it is God is displeased with. Careful investigation will often
show that much of our supposed godly zeal in service is but the result of
habit, or the imitating of some eminent saint, instead of proceeding from the
heart, and being rendered “unto the Lord.”
2. Prayer has to be “exercised” or engaged in.
It is true that painful afflictions have a tendency to stifle the voice of
supplication that one who is smarting under the rod feels little inclination
to approach the Throne of
3. The grace of meekness must be
“exercised,” for “a meek and quiet spirit” is of “great price” in the sight of
Him with whom we have to do
(1 Peter 3:4). Meekness is the
opposite of self-will and hardness of heart. It is a pliability of soul, which
is ready to be fashioned after the Divine image. It is a holy submission,
willing to be molded as the Heavenly Potter determines. There can be no
“peaceable fruit of righteousness” until our wills are broken, and we have no
mind of our own. How much we need to heed that word of Christ’s, “Take My yoke
upon you, and learn of Me, for I am meek” (Matthew 11:29).
4. Patience must be “exercised.” Rest in the Lord,
and wait patiently for
5. Faith must be “exercised.” God’s hand
must be seen in every trial and affliction if it is to be borne with meekness
and patience. While we look no further than the malice of Satan, or the jealousy,
enmity, injustice of men, the heart will be fretful and rebellious. But if
we receive the cup from the
6. Hope must be “exercised.” As faith looks
upward and sees God’s hand in the trial, hope is to look forward and
anticipate the gains thereof. Hope is a confident expectation of future
good. It is the opposite of despair.
7. Love must be “exercised.” It is the
Father’s love which chastens us (verse 5); then ought not we to love Him
in return for His care and patient training of us? Instead of doubting His
wisdom or questioning His goodness, there should be an affectionate gratitude
flowing out to the One who is seeking nothing but our welfare. “We can never
find any benefit in chastenings, unless we are trained by them, that is,
unless all our graces are stirred up by them to a holy, constant exercise”
(John Owen) — how different that, from the fatalistic inertia of many
hyper-Calvinists! What we have sought to bring out above is the fact that
spiritual “fruit” is not the natural or spontaneous effect of
affliction. Nay, have we not observed that few of those who suffer severe
financial reverses, heavy domestic bereavements, or personal bodily pain, are,
spiritually, the gainers thereby. Yea, do we need to look any further than
ourselves, to perceive how little we have learned by and profited from past
trials? And the cause is plain: we were not duly trained thereby. May
this word abide with each of us for the future. What is meant by “the peaceable
fruit of righteousness”? If we took this expression by itself, it would signify
the effects of righteousness, the fruit which righteousness itself
brings forth. But in our text it is chastenings or afflictions which are
specifically mentioned as producing this fruit. It is the Spirit tranquilizing
and purifying the heart. “Righteousness” in our text is parallel with “His
holiness” in verse 10. It may be summed up in the mortification of sin and the
vivification of vital godliness. It is called the “peaceable fruit”
because it issues in the taming of our wild spirits, the quieting of our
restless hearts and a more firm anchoring of our souls. But this only comes
when we truly realize that it is the Father’s love which has afflicted
us. May the Spirit of God grant us all “trained” hearts, so that we shall daily
search ourselves, examine our ways, and be stripped of all that is displeasing
to Him.